Donalyn Miller, author of The Book Whisperer: Awakening the Inner Reader in Every Child, lists the books & authors that were her sixth-grade students’ favorites this year in How Do You Measure a Year of Reading? Her students averaged 57 books each over the course of the school year, but Miller notes that the true measure of her students’ reading is shown in the challenges they set themselves, the new patterns & experiences they explored, and the richness of the “you had to be there” moments they shared:
Participating in a zealous community of readers facilitated their reading growth–no matter how many books each child completed….Each book title represents a story–not only the words on the page–but the story of a reader, who discovered something about literacy, himself, or the world while reading every book. No tally or list adequately captures the power of these stories.

Bugs Bunny Stole My Cognitive Surplus!
or, What's all the hubbub, Bub?
Today is the 70th anniversary of “A Wild Hare” the first appearance of Bugs Bunny, who first appeared in my mother’s generation, and continued to be (as Clay Shirky argues ) one of the primary
time-wastersuses of cognitive surplus indulged in by my own generation.Here’s that original short (which my mom might have seen in the movie theater along with a news reel about the World’s Fair or the Germans bombing London):
This was nominated for an Academy Award. If that disturbs you, perhaps you could pick up Everything Bad Is Good for You in which Steven Johnson argues that pop culture, by demanding more & more of our cognitive surplus in order for us to keep up with it’s increasing complexity, is actually making us smarter.
Not sure if I buy that, but I do know that the stranger Bugs got, the more I liked it:
What do you think? Do popular stories get more complex over time? Have the shows you watch become more challenging? Can complex structure offset vapid content? Is it possible to have both?